Businesses looking to implement goal-setting
First, let’s clarify the terminology a little bit. I’ll give a brief explanation of what MBOs, OKRs, and KPIs are and what the pros and cons may be for each.
Recently, many new Rhythm clients have come to us with their MBOs, which stand for Management by Objectives. This is an old-school management framework originally outlined by Peter Drucker in 1954 that seems to be making a comeback of sorts as companies set objectives for success.
Pros:
Clarity between a manager and a direct report around expectations and how that will impact compensation is highly desirable. People like knowing what their performance is being judged on - they like knowing the targets and what it will take to win.
Cons:
In his book, Measure What Matters, John Doerr outlines a few key areas where MBOs may fall short. They are typically only set on the annual time horizon, which in today’s fast-moving world can be impractical as things change quarterly, monthly, or even more frequently in many industries. They set a clear “what” without a well-defined “how.” They tend to be private, siloed, and tied to compensation. They are generally pushed top-down rather than set collaboratively, and they can encourage contributors to be more risk-averse.
In his HBR Article “Management by Whose Objectives,” Harry Levinson explains that traditional MBOs have many problems, like potentially stifling innovation or motivating employees to focus too much on the numbers at the expense of the bigger strategic picture (think the Wells Fargo account scandal). This traditional approach leaves out human components - like personal goals and strengths outside the compensation structure - that can be more motivating.
Another goal-setting framework that has become increasingly popular is OKRs, which stands for Objectives and Key Results. This is a collaborative process popularized by companies like Google and Intel but has been adopted by companies of all sizes and in all industries. Visual learner? Check out our OKR Explained Video.
Pros:
Rather than being top-down like MBOs, OKRs are more collaborative and transparent. The Objective, like an MBO, outlines what needs to be done, and the Key Results get into the how so many people find this method more helpful for execution.
The time horizon on OKRs is more fluid (not always annual), and they typically are not directly tied to compensation in the same way. The transparent and public nature of OKRs makes it easier to align and cascade goals throughout the organization and eliminate some of the silos that can happen when goals are created in isolation.
Cons:
The relationship between OKRs can be difficult to visualize and understand in practice - especially as your company grows, it can be hard to effectively communicate and focus on a few top things collectively. When goals are set from the bottom up, it can also be hard to get buy-in at the top for some of the work being done. It can also be a heavy lift to implement OKRs because it requires a high level of commitment and discipline as well as an investment in training and set-up time upfront. This blog article provides a more detailed look at OKRs vs. KPIs.
Key Performance Indicators are the handful of numbers most important for measuring your company’s (or your team’s) health. They can be result indicators or leading indicators, which let you know if you are on track to achieving those results.
Pros:
KPIs are more targets than goals, but when used in combination with Priorities or Annual Initiatives, they will help you focus on the few things that are most important in your business - the numbers that matter to ensure your success over time.
They are the measure of whether you are successful in achieving the big goals for your business - think revenue, profit, customer satisfaction, employee health. They can keep you honest - if you have achieved all your goals for your quarter, but your KPIs are Red, you probably didn’t pick the right goals.
Cons:
The temptation with KPIs (like any goals) is to set too many. Looking at too many KPIs will make your eyes cross and prevent you from acting to move the numbers in the right direction. Also, looking at KPIs in isolation is a mistake - they should be paired with specific actions or goals for how you are going to achieve those numbers.
Now that we have level set on the lingo… I’ll say that any of the goal-setting tools above can be highly effective if you use them well.
Regardless of which goal-setting framework you choose, our Rhythm strategic management software platform will help you drive success, and the cloud software supports all of these goal types. After all, setting goals is only the first step - then you have to do the work! Rhythm’s habits and tools will give you visibility into progress, help you have the right conversations, drive collaboration for cross-functional goals, and give you the tools you need to see goals through. We’d love to show you how our software can help you achieve your dreams and goals.
A manager can use the objectives outlined in their MBOs to create effective KPIs to keep track of the progress of the objective, thus creating an MBO KPI. What can be measured? Are there any leading indicators that you can use to adjust early in the process? Visit our comprehensive list of balanced scorecard KPIs that might help get you started in measuring for success. Read our manager's guide for goal setting for more information.
OKR vs KPI: What’s the Difference Between OKRs and KPIs and Why You Need Both?
OKR Spreadsheets: Why You Should Upgrade Your OKR Software Game
Using OKRs for Your Weekly Team Meeting
OKR Video: How to Get Started with OKRs and the Best OKR Software
OKR Examples for Manufacturing: Measure What Matters for the Quarter
Using Red Yellow Green Performance Indicators Examples That Are SMART
OKR Goal Setting Steps: 5 Keys to Drive Better Results
SMART Goal Setting Theory: To Create SMART Goals, Start With “Why”
A Manager's Guide to Goal Setting
Photo Credit: iStock by Getty Images